From 2c9d071aadde88e8ab615be6654e237ae01decb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Felder Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:40:38 -0800 Subject: Retire MRFs DNSRBL, FODirectReply, and QuietReply DNSRBL was a neat experiment which should live out of tree. It works and could be used to coordinate rules across different servers, but Simple Policy will always be better FODirectReply and QuietReply have reliability issues as implemented in an MRF. If we want to expose this functionality to admins it should be a setting that overrides the chosen scope during CommonAPI.post instead of trying to rewrite the recipients with an MRF. --- config/config.exs | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'config/config.exs') diff --git a/config/config.exs b/config/config.exs index 07e98011d..27e2d4711 100644 --- a/config/config.exs +++ b/config/config.exs @@ -413,11 +413,6 @@ config :pleroma, :mrf_vocabulary, accept: [], reject: [] -config :pleroma, :mrf_dnsrbl, - nameserver: "127.0.0.1", - port: 53, - zone: "bl.pleroma.com" - # threshold of 7 days config :pleroma, :mrf_object_age, threshold: 604_800, -- cgit v1.2.3